MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413378173 · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00319

Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals in Outdoor Surface Grime during Pollen Season

2025· article· en· W4413378173 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephanie R. Schneider, Amara L. Holder, Sarah A. Styler

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMcMaster University
KeywordsRadicalPollenEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceChemistryBotanyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On outdoor surfaces, grime is an important substrate for the deposition and reactive loss of semivolatile and particulate bound pollutants. A previously unexplored source of grime reactivity is environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs), which are precursors to reactive oxygen species (ROS). To measure EPFRs in grime, grime was collected in Spring 2023 on glass beads deployed in suburban North Carolina, where possible primary EPFR sources include pollen and nearby prescribed burning. EPFRs are measured in all collected grime samples via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy after extraction of the grime onto filters. Pollen contains the majority of the collected grime mass, and when isolated from the smaller component of the grime constituents via filtration, it comprises most of the measured EPFRs. Endogenous EPFRs were measured in commercial pollen samples ( Quercus rubra, Quercus velutina, and Betula pendula ), which supports the conclusion that pollen contributed to the overall EPFRs measured in the grime. Grime samples were collected under shaded conditions, which limits photochemistry as a secondary source of EPFRs in the field samples; to further investigate light mediated EPFR formation mechanisms, we also measured EPFRs in grime following laboratory photoaging. EPFRs are formed from irradiation in all grime samples; however, extended irradiation eventually reduces the number of EPFRs to their starting numbers, a trend which was also observed with the irradiation of the commercial pollen. The increase of EPFRs over grime age and with irradiation implies that ROS production in grime from EPFRs may also be sensitive to aging over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & Technology LettersSame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207