MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413379191 · doi:10.24124/2025/30530

The effect of thermal experience on the survival of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) during their spawning migration in The Fraser River, BC

2025· dissertation· en· W4413379191 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncorhynchusEctothermFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>GeographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

,Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) hold tremendous cultural, economic, and ecological value. The Fraser River, in British Columbia supports the largest return of sockeye salmon in Canada. The water temperature in the Fraser River has been increasing in recent decades, with an estimated increase of 1.5°C and 3°C in mean and maximum temperatures, respectively, since the 1950s and a significant increase in the number of days above critical thermal threshold for sockeye salmon. Sockeye salmon are ectotherms, meaning their physiology is highly dependent on their external environment and driven by changes in external temperature. Previous studies have shown that sockeye salmon experience significant impairment and mortality between 18°C and 21°C, and that the impacts of water temperature on survival vary between sexes and populations. Data for this study were collected by LGL Limited, UBC, Kintama, and DFO researchers and their partners. 3265 sockeye salmon were captured and either tagged with radio or acoustic transmitters in 2002, 2003, 2006, 2010, and 2011 and their migration was tracked using receiver arrays. Field-based studies that aim to investigate how water temperature affects survival during the adult spawning migration pose several challenges: 1) what aspect of the thermal experience is assessed, 2) imperfect detection can influence the outcome of studies relying on tagged fish, and 3) populations with small numbers of tagged fish can create unreliable estimates. I aim to address these challenges by 1) comparing the effect of three components of thermal experience, 2) by using an integrated travel time model and state-space version of the Cormack Jolly Seber (CJS) model to differentiate survival and detection, and 3) using a hierarchical mixed effects model to improve the survival probability estimates of populations with low sample sizes. The three aspects of thermal experience that were tested were: 1) the average temperature of the first 10 days following entry into the Fraser River, 2) the moving average of river temperature up to the final detection, and 3) the number of days above 18°C up to the final detection. The best fitting model, of the moving average river temperature prior to the final detection, was selected. The highest overall migration survival probability was found in the Harrison River Conservation Unit (CU), while the lowest overall migration survival probability was estimated in the Anderson-Seton CU. Across all CUs the overall migration survival probability estimate was lower for females than males. Male and female sockeye salmon reached 50% survival probability at ~18.5-20°C and ~18°C-19°C average temperature, respectively. These results align with previous research indicating sockeye salmon survival is significantly impaired between 18°C-21°C. These results also provide evidence to support conservation and enhancement of thermal refuges as well as conservation unit and sex-specific escapement targets and management adjustments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→