Aberrant recursive splicing in a human disease locus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recursive splice sites are rare motifs postulated to facilitate splicing across massive introns and shape isoform diversity, especially for long, brain-expressed genes. The necessity of this unique mechanism remains unsubstantiated, as does the role of recursive splicing (RS) in human disease. From analyses of rare copy number variants (CNVs) from almost one million individuals, we previously identified large, heterozygous deletions eliminating an RS site (RS1) in the first intron of CADM2 that conferred substantial risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other neurobehavioral traits. CADM2 encodes a neuronally expressed cell adhesion molecule that has repeatedly been associated with ADHD and numerous similar traits. To explore the molecular impact of RS ablation in CADM2 , we used CRISPR to model patient deletions and to target a smaller region (~500 base pairs) containing RS1 in both human induced neurons (iNs) and rats. Transcriptome analyses in unedited iNs provided a catalog of CADM2 transcripts, including novel transcripts that retained RS exons. Intriguingly, ablating RS1 altered the gradient of RNA abundance across the first intron of CADM2 , decreased the level of CADM2 expression, and impacted transcript usage. Decreased CADM2 expression was reflected in reduced exon usage downstream of the RS1 site and global alteration to genes involved in neuronal processes including synapse and axon development. Given the scale of our analyses and the widespread association of CADM2 with neurobehavioral traits, we sought to validate these findings using in vivo models and found that rodent models harboring Cadm2 RS1 deletions exhibited significant changes in relevant behaviors and functional brain connectivity. In summary, our analyses demonstrate a functional role for RS as a noncoding regulatory mechanism in a gene associated with a spectrum of neuropsychiatric and behavioral traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".