MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413381191 · doi:10.3389/famrs.2025.1609494

High partner specificity in an algal-salamander mutualism at continental scale

2025· article· en· W4413381191 on OpenAlexafffund
Shannon E. Wallace, John A. Burns, Rebecca E. Hale, Ryan Kerney, Cy L. Mott, Cory D. Bishop

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsMutualism (biology)EcologyBiologyScale (ratio)Evolutionary biologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mutualism between the green alga Oophila amblystomatis (“ Oophila ”) and egg masses of the spotted salamander Ambystoma maculatum involves acquisition of algal cells from water, followed by their population growth within individual egg capsules of the egg mass. The host range spans over 20 degrees latitude and longitude. High site fidelity and fine scale genetic structure of host populations has been resolved, but genetic diversity of green algal symbionts across this range has not been investigated. We sampled egg capsule fluid harvested from five locales in North America, each separated by ~2° latitude and used both PacBio and Illumina sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene to investigate (i) whether algal symbionts are restricted to the Oophila clade and (ii) examine geographic variation in Oophila diversity. We also re-analyzed 18S (V4) reads from previous work using contemporary denoising protocols, which, along with current data, produced 16.37 million reads. We detected no chlorophytes outside Oophila clade B and detected cercozoan protists and rhizophydialean fungi in some capsules. There was a mean of 10.14 ± 3.40 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) per sample corresponding to O. amblystomatis , ranging in prevalence from single ponds within a locale to all samples. We observed among-locale variation in unique ASVs, but not in a latitudinal pattern. However, we detected two highly prevalent ASVs (ASVs A and B), which varied in abundance, relative to each other, as a function of latitude. Pairwise alignments of ASVs from the V4 region revealed that, on average, more divergent ASVs were rarer. Haplotype network analysis revealed ASV A as the ancestral variant and amplicon sequence analysis from newly isolated cultures of O. amblystomatis demonstrate that ASVs A and B are intragenomic variants that can segregate. We conclude that, at the scale of the host range, partner specificity in this algal-salamander mutualism is very high and reveal an intriguing effect of latitude on the relative abundance of intragenomic 18S rRNA gene variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Amphibian and Reptile ScienceSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207