Multivalent mpox protein nanoparticle vaccines confer cross-protection against orthopoxvirus infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The outbreak of mpox since 2022 has driven the development of mpox virus (MPXV)-specific, subunit-based, next-generation vaccines, instead of the currently used live-attenuated vaccinia virus (VACV) vaccines. Here, we describe a self-assembling protein nanoparticle against MPXV using lumazine synthase to present viral surface proteins. Multivalent nanoparticles elicited broader and stronger immune responses against MPXV and provided superior heterologous protection in rodent models against lethal VACV challenges compared to monovalent formulations. The three antigens with the best protective efficacy (intracellular mature virus antigens M1 and E8, and extracellular enveloped virus antigen B6) were further combined as the trivalent cocktail or mosaic nanoparticle. The trivalent nanoparticles elicited higher humoral responses compared to the modified vaccinia virus Ankara, and were protective against lethal VACV challenge in mice, with the protection correlation revealed. These findings highlight the potential of multivalent nanoparticle as vaccines against MPXV and other orthopoxviruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".