MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413387021 · doi:10.1055/a-2685-5492

Corrigendum: Prospective, Observational Study of the Clinical Outcomes of FVIII Treatment in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A

2025· erratum· en· W4413387021 on OpenAlexaff
Pratima Chowdary, Liane Khoo, Michael Wang, Hérvè Chambost, Annemieke Willemze, Johannes Oldenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueTH Open · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyHaemophiliaMedicinePediatricsProspective cohort studyHaemophilia AInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The abstract incorrectly stated that 18% of patients on prophylaxis had "five or more" bleeds, whereas it should have stated "more than five."In other words, 18% of patients experienced more than five bleeds in a year while on prophylaxis.The abstract has now been corrected to reflect the accurate information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTH OpenSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207