MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413394181 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2025.3601156

Hysteresis-Estimator-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Control for Piezoelectric Micro-Positioning Stage With Time-Varying Output Constraints

2025· article· en· W4413394181 on OpenAlexaff
Linlin Nie, Yewei Yu, Miaolei Zhou, Xiuyu Zhang, Chun‐Yi Su

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)HysteresisEstimatorFuzzy logicPiezoelectricityStage (stratigraphy)Computer scienceFuzzy control systemControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringPhysicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief addresses the high-precision motion control of piezoelectric micro-positioning stages (PMPSs) subject to time-varying output constraints, input hysteresis nonlinearity, and system uncertainties. The key features of the developed hysteresis-estimator-based adaptive fuzzy control (HEAFC) method are as follows. First, an asymmetric rate-dependent hysteresis operator is used to construct an extended fuzzy input space, enabling a fuzzy dynamic hysteresis estimator (FDHE) for real-time hysteresis estimation via adaptive fuzzy logic. Second, auxiliary functions are embedded into a backstepping-like control framework to explicitly handle time-varying output constraints. Moreover, by leveraging the structural characteristics of fuzzy systems, the HEAFC scheme avoids repeated differentiation or filtering of virtual control laws. This feature can substantially simplify the control structure. The HEAFC method guarantees prespecified constraint satisfaction and high-accuracy trajectory tracking. Lyapunov-based analysis ensures closed-loop stability, and experimental results on a PMPS demonstrate the effectiveness of the HEAFC strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207