MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413396748 · doi:10.3390/ani15162460

Nutrient Profile, Energy Digestibility in Pigs, and In Vitro Degradation Characteristics of Wheat Flour Milling Co-Products

2025· article· en· W4413396748 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rajesh Jha, Prajwal R. Regmi, L. F. Wang, A. Pharazyn, R. T. Zijlstra

Bibliographic record

VenueAnimals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBranFood scienceFermentationDry matterChemistryOrganic matterDigestion (alchemy)AgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using wheat flour milling (WFM) co-products in pig diets may reduce feed cost. Still, energy digestibility is lower for WFM co-products than for feed grains. Inadequate information exists about their fermentation characteristics and the relationship between digestible energy (DE) value and chemical characteristics or in vitro energy digestibility. The objectives were to (1) determine the chemical characteristics, in vitro and in vivo DE values, and energy digestibility of WFM co-products in growing pigs; (2) determine their in vitro microbial fermentation characteristics, and (3) establish relationships between in vivo DE value of WFM co-products and their chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, or in vitro digestibility values. Across Canada, 94 WFM co-products were sampled and characterized for their chemical composition and in vitro dry matter (DM) and energy digestibility using pepsin, pancreatin, and a multi-enzyme complex containing arabinase, β-glucanase, hemicellulase, xylanase, and cellulase. The in vivo energy, DM digestibility and DE value of 9 WFM co-products (2 shorts, 5 millrun, 1 middling, and 1 bran) were determined using a corn-based diet and 40 growing pigs in two periods to obtain 8 observations per diet. After in vitro digestion, the 9 WFM co-product samples were subjected to microbial fermentation using fresh fecal inoculum in a cumulative gas-production technique. The WFM co-products had a high content of crude fiber (up to 7.9% in shorts, 9.9% in millrun, 7.1% in middlings, and 12.0% in bran) and crude protein (CP; up to 27.8% in shorts, 20.0% in millrun, 22.1% in middlings, 15.9% in bran). The DE values ranged from 2.84 to 3.74 Mcal/kg DM among WFM co-products. Among chemical characteristics, neutral detergent fiber was the best predictor (R2 = 0.81) for in vivo DE value, followed by crude fiber (R2 = 0.78), and acid detergent fiber (R2 = 0.72). The in vitro DE values predicted (R2 = 0.80) in vivo DE values of 9 WFM co-products. Based on principal component analysis, total gas and short-chain fatty acid production varied among WFM co-products and was associated with the CP content of WFM co-products. In conclusion, WFM co-products contain high crude protein and have a high DE value for growing pigs but vary substantially in nutritional value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnimalsSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207