MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413399994 · doi:10.53055/icimod.1097

2025 Drought in Nepal's Madhesh Province: A rapid situational analysis

2025· report· en· W4413399994 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bipin Dulal, Vijay Ratan Khadgi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreChinese Academy of SciencesInternational Centre for Integrated Mountain DevelopmentUnited Nations Development Programme
KeywordsSituational ethicsSituation analysisGeographyBusinessPsychologySocial psychologyMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Madhesh Province, Nepal’s “Grain Basket,” is facing a severe and prolonged drought in mid-2025 due to deficient winter rains and weak monsoon performance. Rainfall deficits of 30–50% have critically reduced groundwater recharge, dried up more than 30% of boreholes, and caused widespread water shortages, especially in Mahottari, Dhanusha, and Siraha districts. Satellite data and ground reports show significant crop stress, with delayed rice transplantation (only 52% completed vs. 92% last year) and an estimated shortfall of 400,000–450,000 metric tons of rice, potentially cutting national rice supply by 10%. The crisis is already leading to income losses for farmers, rising food prices, and risks of large-scale food insecurity. The government has declared Madhesh a disaster zone and initiated emergency measures such as deep and shallow tubewell installations and small irrigation schemes. ICIMOD is supporting with Earth observation–based drought monitoring and technical advice. Recommendations include: Short-term: seed replacements, alternative irrigation (mobile pumps, drip, sprinklers), crop diversification, food and water aid, and health support. Long-term: direct seeding methods, sustainable groundwater recharge (nature-based solutions, canal rehabilitation, Sunkoshi Marin Diversion Project), crop diversification, and stricter Chure Hills conservation. The report calls for urgent, coordinated action among government, development partners, farmers, and scientific bodies to mitigate the crisis and strengthen climate resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207