MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413401139 · doi:10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.105141

NPPA-Associated Atrial Dilated Cardiomyopathy

2025· article· en· W4413401139 on OpenAlexaff
Cinzia Forleo, Marco Maria Dicorato, Maria Cristina Carella, Paolo Basile, Ilaria Dentamaro, Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono, Andrea Igoren Guaricci, Nicoletta Resta, Marco Matteo Ciccone, Eloisa Arbustini

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilated cardiomyopathyCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineCardiomyopathyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Atrial standstill is a rare arrhythmogenic disorder characterized by complete atrial electrical and mechanical inactivity. We report the 15th documented case of atrial dilated cardiomyopathy associated with the homozygous c.449G>A (p.Arg150Gln) NPPA mutation. CASE SUMMARY: A 31-year-old woman presented with persistent atrial fibrillation, biatrial enlargement, and junctional rhythm. Electrophysiological studies confirmed atrial inexcitability. Despite preserved ventricular function, she required permanent His-bundle pacing. Genetic testing later revealed a homozygous NPPA mutation, whereas heterozygous family members remained asymptomatic. DISCUSSION: This case highlights the diagnostic value of genetic testing in young patients with atrial fibrillation and no structural heart disease. Early recognition of NPPA-related atrial dilated cardiomyopathy may guide arrhythmia management and anticoagulation strategies, reducing thromboembolic risk. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Broader implementation of genetic screening in selected individuals with isolated atrial dysfunction may support earlier diagnosis, personalized treatment, and better outcomes in this ultrarare condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Case ReportsSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207