Escherichia coli proteins uL29 and ACP stabilize the Tn7-encoded TnsD and its DNA binding
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tn7 mobile genetic elements are known for their sophisticated target-site selection mechanisms and, in some cases, programmability. Recognition of target sites is mediated by designated transposon-encoded proteins and modulated by host factor proteins. In the case of the CRISPR-associated Tn7 elements from the type V-K, the ribosomal protein uS15 is an integral component of recruitment complex that promotes R-loop completion. Previous biochemical work also revealed that the ribosomal protein uL29 and the acyl carrier protein (ACP) influence Tn7 transposition frequency in vitro. However, how uL29 and ACP regulate the formation of the Tn7 targeting complex remains unclear. The prototypical Tn7 element encodes a heteromeric transposase (TnsA, TnsB), a AAA + adaptor (TnsC), and two target-site selection proteins (TnsD and TnsE). TnsD targets a highly conserved site at the end of the glmS gene (attTn7). However, poor protein stability has precluded the molecular characterization of how TnsD recognizes its target site. Here, we show that ACP and uL29 interact with the C-terminal region of TnsD through reciprocal electrostatic interactions, in turn, mitigating its tendency to aggregate. Additionally, we identify the uL29 and ACP residues that mediate the interaction with TnsD and stimulate DNA binding. These results unveil unique features of the TnsD-mediated target-site selection complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it