MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413418935 · doi:10.1002/rra.70008

Poor Upstream Passage for Endangered Atlantic Salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) at a Trap‐and‐Transport Fishway in the Wolastoq/Saint John River, New Brunswick

2025· article· en· W4413418935 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Christopher Hill, Antóin M. O’Sullivan, J. Derek Hogan, R. Allen Curry, Tommi Linnansaari, Philip M. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueRiver Research and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSalmoEndangered speciesFisheryTrap (plumbing)Environmental scienceSAINTGeographyFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyBiologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Declines of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) in the Wolastoq/Saint John River have largely coincided with hydropower development, and there is an urgent need to understand the status of bidirectional passage at existing barriers. We evaluated upstream passage efficiency and duration at the lowermost hydroelectric dam (Mactaquac Generating Station), which targets salmon for upstream passage with a manually operated fish lift and transport system. In a 2‐year study, we captured, tagged, and released upstream adult migrants within 500 m of the fishway and monitored their movements using PIT, radio, and acoustic telemetry. Overall, a low proportion (19%) of individuals that approached the dam passed upstream, and successful individuals experienced considerable passage delays (mean = 58 days) despite visiting the fishway on multiple occasions prior to passage (mean = 8 visits). Salmon were approximately 41 times more likely to visit the fishway entrance during daylight hours (92% of total fishway detections occurred during daylight), likely reflecting elevated power generation and flow conditions during daylight. Further, salmon were approximately five times more likely to visit the fishway entrance while the fishway was not operational (70% of fishway detections while not operating). Accordingly, provided that the current daily flow regime at Mactaquac is not changed, we recommend increased fishway operation efforts during daylight hours to increase opportunities for salmon to pass upstream. However, we also found that salmon rarely reached the fishway crowding pool during fishway visits (regardless of fishway operation status), which suggests that issues of attraction and guidance within the lower fishway should be addressed in synchrony with increased fishway operation efforts. Ultimately, our observations suggest that poor fishway attraction, guidance, and operation schedules have been key factors limiting successful upstream passage for salmon in the river and highlight the importance of evaluating fishway performance post‐construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiver Research and ApplicationsSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207