MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advancing digital soil mapping with multi-year crop cover data: Impacts on model accuracy and soil interpretation

2025· article· en· W4413419726 on OpenAlex
Babak Kasraei, Margaret Schmidt, Daniel D. Saurette, Chuck Bulmer, Jin Zhang, Travis Pennell, Kingsley John, Brandon Heung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMinistry of ForestsMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsSimon Fraser University
FundersOntario Ministry of Food and AgricultureCanada Foundation for InnovationAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsDigital soil mappingEnvironmental scienceCover cropInterpretation (philosophy)Soil mapCover (algebra)Soil scienceRemote sensingSoil coverSoil surveyDigital elevation modelHydrology (agriculture)GeologyComputer scienceSoil waterAgroforestryEngineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vegetation cover has a significant influence on soil properties and is commonly used as a covariate in digital soil mapping (DSM). Crop frequency (CrFr) covariates, representing the frequency with which a certain crop or class of crops are grown over multiple years, can be derived from multi-year vegetation data. Such data have the potential to provide promising insights into soil conditions and can enhance predictions of soil properties. Predictive modelling within a DSM framework can improve our understanding of the relationship between crop cover and different soil properties. This study had two main objectives: (1) to develop DSM models for six soil properties—bulk density (BD), organic carbon (OC), A horizon thickness (AT), total nitrogen (TN), pH, and cation exchange capacity (CEC)—both with and without CrFr covariates, and to compare their accuracy metrics; each soil property was modelled independently as a separate response variable; and (2) to investigate the relationships between covariates such as crop types, precipitation, and temperature and soil properties. The study was conducted in the Ottawa, Canada, region, an area with diverse crop cover. From 13 years of Annual Crop Inventory (ACI) raster data, five CrFr covariates were generated and added to other covariates commonly used in DSM, resulting in a total of 54 covariates for model training. Twelve models were developed for the six soil properties, both with and without CrFr covariates. Validation results showed that including CrFr covariates improved the accuracy of models for BD, OC, AT, and TN. However, the impact on models for pH and CEC was minimal, indicating that intrinsic soil factors likely influence these properties more than CrFr. Partial dependence plots indicated that the models captured expected patterns, such as the negative association of forest cover with BD and its positive relationship with OC and TN. In contrast, crops such as legumes and corn exhibit the opposite effects. Forests exhibited a negative relationship with AT, whereas croplands showed a positive association, indicating a likely difference between the Ap horizon and Ah. Uncertainty analysis revealed lower uncertainty in agricultural cropland areas and those with lower elevations. This study highlights the potential of DSM in assessing the impact of crop type on soils and suggesting what crops may be more beneficial for soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it