Dedicated prostate DOI-TOF-PET based on the ProVision detection concept
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. The ProVision scanner is a dedicated prostate positron emission tomography (PET) system with limited angular coverage; it employs a new detector technology that provides high spatial resolution as well as information about depth-of-interaction (DOI) and time-of-flight (TOF). The goal of this work is to develop a flexible image reconstruction framework and study the image performance of the current ProVision scanner. Approach. Experimental datasets, including point-like sources, an image quality phantom, and a pelvic phantom, were acquired using the ProVision scanner to investigate the impact of oblique lines of response introduced via a multi-offset scanning protocol. This approach aims to mitigate data truncation artefacts and further characterise the current imaging performance of the system. For image reconstruction, we applied the list-mode Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximisation algorithm incorporating TOF information. The system matrix and sensitivity models account for both detector attenuation and position uncertainty. Main results. The scanner provides good spatial resolution on the coronal plane; however, elongations caused by the limited angular coverage distort the reconstructed images. The availability of TOF and DOI information, as well as the addition of a multi-offset scanning protocol, could not fully compensate for these distortions. Significance. The ProVision scanner concept, with innovative detector technology, shows promising outcomes for fast and inexpensive PET without CT. Despite current limitations due to limited angular coverage, which leads to image distortions, ongoing advancements, such as improved timing resolution, regularisation techniques, and artificial intelligence, are expected to significantly reduce these artefacts and enhance image quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".