Enhancing volatile organic compounds (VOC) adsorption and electrothermal regeneration of CuBTC using carbonaceous and metallic modifiers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to enhance the adsorption capacity for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the electrical conductivity of a metal-organic framework (MOF) CuBTC to enable electrothermal regeneration after VOC exposure. CuBTC was modified by integrating carbonaceous materials using sonication-assisted synthesis, solvothermal techniques, and post-synthesis physical mixing, as well as incorporating metallic modifiers using sonication-assisted synthesis. X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed the samples' structural integrity, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) provided insights into thermal stability up to 250 °C and modifier content in the final product. Nitrogen and n-heptane adsorption isotherms assessed adsorption properties and surface characteristics, while transmission electron microscopy (TEM) evaluated the dispersion of the modifiers. Electrical resistivity measurements indicated that graphene was the most effective in reducing resistivity (achieving resistivity of 0.04 Ω·m), followed by CNT-modified samples. Although most modified samples had reduced surface areas and porosities, physically mixing CuBTC with 50 wt% PC (porous carbon) yielded a sample with a surface area of 1,294 m 2 /g, surpassing the 1,228 m 2 /g of unmodified CuBTC, with a resistivity of 0.42 Ω·m, within the suitable range for electrothermal regeneration (0.2–0.8 Ω·m). The electrothermal regeneration of this sample consumed 71 kJ/g.hr, less than the 300 kJ/g.hr required for conventional regeneration, and reached a desorption temperature of 120°C in 30 minutes, compared to 60 minutes for conventional regeneration. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential for modifying CuBTC to produce electrically conductive MOFs suitable for electrothermal regeneration. It offers an energy-efficient approach to pollution control and remediation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".