Pecking block use at individual level is associated with improved eggshell quality and keel fractures in laying hens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laying hens possess a calcium-specific appetite that intensifies towards lights out to meet the high demands for eggshell formation and skeletal maintenance. Pecking blocks (PBs) are edible enrichments that can serve as an additional calcium source. We explored the relationships between PB preference (PBp), PB use, keel fracture status (KS), and eggshell quality. One hundred and twenty Dekalb White and 120 Bovans Brown were housed in twelve enriched cages. Three types of PB differing in calcium and grain content were offered in a series of paired preference tests over three 4-week periods in phase 1 of the study (26 to 39 WOA). This was repeated in phase 2 (41 to 48 WOA), with three 2-week periods. Block pecking behavior was measured at the individual level by live observations of 7 focal birds per cage (n = 77) once weekly (3-time intervals). Relative PBp was based on the frequency of pecks calculated as preference ratio between PBs. Hens were categorized as PB "users" or "nonusers" based on the number of pecks at all blocks throughout the experiment. After each period, hens with PBp were isolated for egg collection. The egg weight (EW in g), shell breaking strength (SBS in kg force), and shell thickness (ST in mm) were analyzed. Using radiography, we scored keel fractures at 40 WOA (baseline) and after each period in phase 2. Consistency of hen's PBp between phases was determined using kappa analysis and indicated moderate agreement (kappa = 0.6). PBp had no association with KS (p = 0.36), EW(p = 0.64), and SBS (p = 0.68). However, block "users" maintained ST over time (p = 0.002) and had higher SBS (p = 0.009) compared to "nonusers." Hens who experienced a new keel fracture during phase 2 (n = 11) increased pecking in phase 2 compared to phase 1 (p= 0.023) and pecked more than hens without a keel fracture in phase 2 (n = 11; p= 0.006). This study suggests that individual hens' use of pecking blocks may reflect individual calcium demand for eggshell formation and bone repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".