MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413427349 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0013405

Inter-epidemic seroprevalence of Rift Valley fever virus and associated risk factors in humans in Eastern Rwanda

2025· article· en· W4413427349 on OpenAlexafffund
Isidore Nsengimana, David J. Kelvin, Evodie Uwibambe, Edson Rwagasore, Claude Mambo Muvunyi, Gillian Eastwood, Augustino A. Chengula, Christopher J. Kasanga

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Vectors
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRwanda Biomedical CentreNational Institute of Food and AgricultureResearch Nova Scotia
KeywordsSeroprevalenceRift Valley feverOutbreakZoonosisSerologyVeterinary medicineMedicineEnvironmental healthDemographyVirologyImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a mosquito-borne zoonosis that causes periodic and explosive epizootics/epidemics in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. In Rwanda, RVF virus (RVFV) circulation has resulted into two major outbreaks in 2018 and 2022, both of which involving humans. Information on the magnitude of human exposure to RVFV in the country is scarce. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of RVFV and associated risk factors in humans in the Eastern province of Rwanda, 3 years after the end of the 2018 outbreak. METHODOLOGY: A total of 552 outpatients at health facilities in five districts of the Eastern province were randomly sampled and interviewed between December 2021 and February 2022. Exposure to RVFV was examined by detection of anti-RVFV IgG/IgM antibodies in serum samples using a competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the association between risk factors and RVFV seropositivity. RESULTS: The findings revealed an overall seroprevalence of 9.6%. The highest seropositivity, but without significant difference, was observed in Bugesera district (12.9%), followed by Kayonza, (10.8%), Kirehe (8.6%), Rwamagana (7.0%) and Ngoma (6.8%). Odds of seropositivity were significantly higher in people with a history of slaughtering animals (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.04 - 4.91, p = 0.03), and milking (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.23 - 5.49, p = 0.012). Sex and age-related differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: This study is a first serological survey of RVFV spillover to humans in the country and shows that rural communities in Rwanda have been exposed to RVFV. These findings suggest the Eastern province of Rwanda as a potential hotspot for RVFV circulation, and emphasize the need for a countrywide One Health-based surveillance, prevention, and control strategy to minimize the effects of RVFV in the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS neglected tropical diseasesSame topicViral Infections and VectorsFrench-language works237,207