MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413430513 · doi:10.52783/jisem.v10i58s.12577

AudioAid creation using Open-Source Audiometric Notched Hearing as a Therapy for Tinnitus Relief

2025· article· en· W4413430513 on OpenAlexaff
Vidhu Shekhar Bajpai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information Systems Engineering & Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTinnitusAudiologyMedicineOpen sourceComputer scienceSoftwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tinnitus affects millions of people around the world, and, unfortunately, there are very few effective treatment options, particularly for those without access to specialized audiological care. AudioAid is a new, innovative, open-source, comprehensive web-based platform that provides individual patients with personalized notched auditory stimulation therapy through any standard web browser and headphones. The platform utilizes a diagnostic module that identifies the frequency of the individual's tinnitus, and a selection of custom therapeutic pathways that include nightly listening sessions that contain white noise filtered with spectral notches centred on the patient's tinnitus frequency. AudioAid is built on modern web development technology, specifically React.js and serverless architecture, which allows us to eliminate traditional barriers of access for tinnitus treatment services since the platform does not require any specialized hardware or a therapist's supervision. The diagnostic component generates a dual assessment of the laterality, subjective intensity, and dominant frequency characteristics of an individual's tinnitus, and the therapeutic component generates dermatological filtered white noise listening sessions, each meant for passive listening at night. Components to foster user engagement, motivate progress, monitor clinical and treatment outcomes, and encourage adherence to their listening sessions are included. Dashboards of progress tracking, automated reminders to encourage adherence, and self-assessment are identified as user engagement features. This democratized access and evidence-based solution addresses a very real separation between the clinical advances made in notched auditory stimulation studies and the accessibility of those advances for patients around the world. AudioAid ideally represents how a scalable, low-cost intervention can be provided, which allows individuals to manage their tinnitus symptoms using evidence-based techniques to educate them on the use of spectral filtering that, overall, has the potential to change the way we deliver auditory healthcare services to underserved populations worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207