Thiamidol in Melasma in Patients of Skin of Color: A Preliminary Report of Efficacy and Safety
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melasma poses significant therapeutic challenges, especially in patients with skin of color, due to the increased risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Thiamidol, a novel topical tyrosinase inhibitor, has demonstrated potential efficacy with a favorable safety profile in treating hyperpigmentation disorders. OBJECTIVE: This case series evaluates the efficacy and safety of Thiamidol in women of skin of color with melasma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten Indian women with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and melasma applied 0.2% Thiamidol twice daily for 12 weeks. Outcomes were measured using the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) and patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: The average reduction in mMASI was 34.4%, with patient satisfaction averaging 62%. Reported adverse effects were minimal and self-limiting. LIMITATIONS: A small sample size and the lack of a control group limit generalizability of the results. Future research should explore thiamidol's efficacy in combination therapies and assess its long-term benefits. CONCLUSION: Thiamidol is a promising and well-tolerated treatment for melasma in patients with skin of color.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".