MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413448597 · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2025.101855

Examining interparental conflict, parent-child conflict, and child emotion regulation within the Family Check-Up®: A randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4413448597 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Katrina R. Abela, Andrea González, Krysta Andrews, Xutong Zhang, Marc Jambon, Katholiki Georgiades, Julie Gross, Magdalena Janus, Ellen L. Lipman, Paulo Pires, Teresa Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalWilfrid Laurier UniversityMcMaster University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyRandomized controlled trialFamily conflictChild custody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interparental and parent-child conflict are key familial risk factors for emotion regulation (ER) difficulties in early childhood. This study examined the impact of the Family Check-Up® (FCU), a preventative family-centered intervention, on child ER at 12 months post-intervention, and whether the FCU moderated the association between early exposure to family conflicts (interparental and parent-child conflict) and ER outcomes. In a longitudinal randomized controlled trial conducted in Canada, 206 parent-child dyads (children aged 2–4 years) with early indicators of emotional and behavioural risk were assigned to the FCU intervention or a community control group. ER was assessed using an observational task coded into three ER strategy subgroups: behavioural coping, task-oriented, and emotion-oriented. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the models. Results indicated that the FCU intervention significantly reduced the number of behavioural coping ER strategies, such as avoidance and expressing negative affect. Moreover, the FCU buffered the negative association between parent-child conflict and task-oriented ER. However, interparental conflict was not significantly associated with ER outcomes and effects were not observed for emotion-oriented ER. These findings highlight the FCU's potential to reduce contextually maladaptive ER and mitigate the impact of parent-child conflict on child ER. • Followed 206 at-risk children aged 2–4 years for 12 months post-intervention in a randomized trial. • Coding identified three emotion regulation subgroups: behavioural coping, task-oriented, emotion-oriented. • Family Check-Up® reduced behavioural coping emotion regulation strategies. • Family Check-Up® moderated the link between parent-child conflict and task-oriented emotion regulation. • Interparental conflict was not significantly associated with any emotion regulation outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Developmental PsychologySame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207