MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413451543 · doi:10.1080/17518423.2025.2550898

New requirements for structured abstracts and key points

2025· editorial· en· W4413451543 on OpenAlexaff
Debopam Samanta, Marie Brossard‐Racine

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neurorehabilitation · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Computer sciencePsychologyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are pleased to announce an important update to our author guidelines: all original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses must now include a structured abstract following a sta...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.315
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.696
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3150.696
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.014
Bibliometrics0.0360.027
Science and technology studies0.0100.011
Scholarly communication0.0470.029
Open science0.0120.017
Research integrity0.0390.039
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2600.273

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeurorehabilitationSame topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207