MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413461257 · doi:10.1155/pedi/5294835

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Children With Type 1 Diabetes

2025· article· en· W4413461257 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kristen Favel, Maryellen S. Kelly, Sy Lam, Jeffrey N. Bone, Kathryn E. Morgan, Heidi A. Stephany, Sruthi Thomas, Kourosh Afshar, Constadina Panagiotopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Diabetes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesChildren's Hospital FoundationNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children’s Hospital FoundationBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusType 1 diabetesInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Urologic complications, including urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections are commonly observed in the adult population with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, there remains a paucity of data on the prevalence, associated risk factors and impact of bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) in the pediatric T1D population. Aim: This study aims to examine the prevalence of BBD in children with T1D compared to healthy pediatric controls and to explore clinical factors associated with childhood BBD. Methods: This cross‐sectional, noninterventional, multicenter survey study involved children with TID and healthy controls aged 5–16 years across North America. Participants and their caregivers completed the Vancouver Symptom Score (VSS) to assess bowel and bladder symptoms. BBD was defined as a total VSS score of 11 or greater. Logistic regression was used to identify potential factors associated with BBD and bother with symptoms. Results: In a group of 242 participants with T1D and 86 controls, 46% were male, and the median age was 11.0 years. The prevalence of BBD was found to be higher in participants with T1D at 21.5%, compared to 10.5% in controls. While irritative symptoms were most commonly reported in the T1D group with BBD, urinary incontinence caused the most bother. In the T1D group, poorer glycemic control was linked to a greater likelihood of BBD, while male sex and more severe symptomatology (such as urinary incontinence) were associated with greater bother related to these symptoms. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of BBD in children with T1D compared to healthy controls. These data highlight the need for early identification and intervention for BBD in T1D. Proactive measures, such as routine screening and comprehensive T1D management with strict attention to glycemic control, are crucial to address the significant burden of BBD and improve overall health outcomes for children with T1D and their families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric DiabetesSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207