MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413471353 · doi:10.1115/1.4069475

A Novel Swirled Trichannel Injector for Hydrogen Combustion

2025· article· en· W4413471353 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime Leroy, Clément Mirat, Antoine Renaud, Stefano Puggelli, Ronan Vicquelin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
FundersAssociation Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
KeywordsInjectorCombustionChannel (broadcasting)Nuclear engineeringHydrogenMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Decarbonization is driving the development of various technologies to reduce the environmental impact across multiple fields. In aerospace and other sectors, hydrogen is envisioned as an alternative fuel for carbon-free combustion. As a result, many different combustion technologies are being developed to adapt processes to hydrogen operations. In the context of combustion in an aircraft turbine, new hydrogen combustion technologies must comply with stability and low emission requirements, as the higher reactivity and flame temperature raise concerns about flashback and nitrogen oxide emissions. This work focuses on one specific combustion technology derived from the conventional Rich-Quench-Lean technology in wide use in current aircraft engines. It is based on the injection of a rich premix followed by air injection in order to achieve globally lean conditions and finish combustion. To accommodate this new injection technology, an injector was developed to leverage the unique properties of rich premixed hydrogen flames, particularly their high resistance to strain. To do so, the injector was designed around a concentric arrangement of three channels, with hydrogen being injected in the intermediate channel in order to benefit from two shear layers surrounding the flame. This setup aims to reduce flame temperature and NOx emissions while ensuring a stable flame through the injection of a rich mixture. To increase control over the flame structure, each channel of the injector was fitted with a swirler. The individual and combined effects of these swirlers were investigated to yield an inventory of the flame types possible on the injector. To do so, OH* chemiluminescence imaging was employed. In addition, using a gas analyzer, we monitor NOx emissions in various conditions to evaluate the effects of the different parameters of this new injector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207