MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413471648 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.18.670935

A new subgenome of the <i>Camelina</i> genus reveals genome dominance is controlled by chromosomal proximity

2025· preprint· en· W4413471648 on OpenAlexaff
Raju Chaudhary, Kevin Koh, Peng Gao, Sampath Perumal, Erin E. Higgins, Kyla Horner, Stephen J. Robinson, Zhengping Wang, Christina Eynck, Venkat Bandi, Andrew Sharpe, Isobel A. P. Parkin

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCamelinaDominance (genetics)BiologyGenomeGeneticsGenusEvolutionary biologyCamelina sativaComputational biologyBiotechnologyBotanyGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Camelina sativa is an oilseed of the Brassicaceae , whose close relatives vary in ploidy number, providing a novel platform for studying plant genome evolution. The availability of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid species of Camelina allow the evolutionary trajectory and fate of duplicated genes in the neopolyploid Camelina species to be elucidated. Here we report an improved assembly of the widely used C. sativa reference DH55 and three new genome assemblies of Camelina microcarpa ; one tetraploid CN119243 (2n = 26), and two hexaploids with divergent chromosome numbers, Type 1 - CN119205 (2n=40) and Type 2 - CN120025 (2n=38). The tetraploid represents the first step in the evolutionary path to form C. sativa , while the hexaploids suggest three divergent lineages in the formation of higher ploidy Camelina species. The previously uncharacterized fourth subgenome found in C. microcarpa Type 2, although showing some homology to the C. sativa diploid progenitor genome, C. neglecta , showed numerous unique chromosomal rearrangements differentiating it from other subgenomes present in known Camelina species. Although this species was recently formed, the second subgenome showed gene expression dominance, which was in contrast to both 2n=40 Camelina species where the third subgenome was dominant. The expression dominance in Type 2 C. microcarpa contradicted the accepted two-step evolutionary process which led to the generation of related Brassicaceae species. However, the observed genome dominance in all Camelina species was negatively correlated with inter-subgenome chromatin interaction frequencies, suggesting that chromosome confirmation and proximity in the nucleus contributes to this mechanism of genome evolution. Despite the differences in genome structure, successful inter-specific hybridization provided evidence of chromosomal exchange between the divergent third sub-genomes of C. sativa and C. microcarpa Type 2, opening up a novel avenue to new diversity in the established oilseed. Key points An improved genomic understanding of Camelina species and identification of distinct subgenome structures and relationships, which will facilitate strategies to increase the genetic diversity in C. sativa . Subgenome evolution and subgenome dominance in polyploids is associated with chromosomal architecture and proximity in the nucleus. Genome assemblies representing all ploidy levels in the Camelina genus provide a unique and valuable platform for polyploid research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207