MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413476954 · doi:10.1111/gbb.70033

Genome‐Wide Association Studies of Delay Discounting and Impulsive Personality Traits in Children From the Adolescent Behavior and Cognitive Development Study

2025· article· en· W4413476954 on OpenAlexafffund
Wei Q. Deng, Mahmoud Elsayed, Kyla Belisario, Sandra Sanchez‐Roige, Abraham A. Palmer, James MacKillop

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes Brain & Behavior · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute on Drug AbusePeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research
KeywordsDelay discountingAssociation (psychology)Genome-wide association studyCognitionPsychologyBig Five personality traitsImpulsivityPersonalityDevelopmental psychologyDiscountingClinical psychologyGeneticsNeuroscienceBiologySocial psychologyGenotypePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Impulsivity, often operationalized as delay discounting (DD) and as impulsive personality traits via the UPPS‐P scales, is a key transdiagnostic construct across psychiatric disorders. Recent genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have studied the genetic basis of impulsivity in adults, but it remains unclear how similar the genetic architecture of DD is in children. The present study conducted GWAS of DD and impulsivity traits in 5548 children (ages 9–10 years old) of genetically inferred European ancestry from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Heritability estimates for DD ( h 2 = 0.20, S.E. = 0.10) and UPPS‐P subscales ( h 2 = 0.08–0.11 S.E. = 0.05) were comparable to adult estimates. Genetic correlations between adult and child impulsivity were modest ( r g = 0.28–0.46), with positive urgency showing the strongest correlation ( r g = 0.83). While no genome‐wide significant associations were identified, the top associated variants were mapped to genes previously linked to smoking initiation (rs3820908; p = 6.5 × 10 −8 ) and UPPS‐P Lack of Premeditation (rs17292179; p = 4.2 × 10 −7 ). Polygenic score (PGS) associations were used to compare the genetic signals in children with those reported in adults. Adult PGSs for DD and positive and negative urgency indicators explained small but significant variance in the respective child impulsivity phenotypes (0.36%–0.44%, p < 7.5 × 10 −4 ). Additionally, UPPS‐P indices were broadly associated with PGSs derived from adult externalizing (0.42%–1.02%) and ADHD (0.23%–0.79%). This first GWAS of impulsivity in children offers a developmentally informed comparison of genetic influences, revealing both similarities and differences by developmental stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes Brain & BehaviorSame topicBehavioral Health and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207