Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Meningioma: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Management Approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Recurrent meningiomas remain difficult to manage due to the absence of effective systemic therapies and comparatively high treatment failure rates, particularly in high-grade tumors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally-invasive and precise option, particularly for tumors in surgically complex locations. However, the risks associated with re-irradiation, and recent changes in the WHO classification of CNS tumors highlight the need for more personalized and strategic treatment approaches. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy, and clinical considerations for use of SRS for recurrent meningiomas. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies reporting outcomes of SRS in recurrent, pathologically confirmed intracranial meningiomas. Studies were excluded if they were commentaries, reviews, case reports with fewer than three cases, or had inaccessible full text. The quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, SRS treatment parameters, clinical outcomes, adverse effects, and statistical analysis results were extracted. Results: Sixteen studies were included. For WHO Grade I tumors, 3- to 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 85% to 100%. Grade II meningiomas demonstrated more variable outcomes, with 3-year PFS ranging from 23% to 100%. Grade III tumors had consistently poorer outcomes, with reported 1-year and 2-year PFS rates as low as 0% and 46%, respectively. SRS performed after surgery alone was associated with superior outcomes, with local control rates of 79% to 100% and 5-year PFS ranging from 40.4% to 91%. In contrast, tumors previously treated with radiotherapy, with or without surgery, showed substantially poorer outcomes, with 3- to 5-year PFS ranging from 26% to 41% and local control rates as low as 31%. Among patients with prior radiotherapy, outcomes were particularly poor in Grade II and III recurrent tumors. Toxicity rates ranged from 3.7% to 37%, and were generally higher for patients with prior radiation. Predictors of worse PFS included prior radiation, older age, and Grade III histology. Conclusions: SRS may represent a reasonable salvage option for carefully selected patients with recurrent meningioma, particularly following surgery alone. Outcomes were notably worse in high-grade recurrent meningiomas following prior radiotherapy, emphasizing the prognostic significance of both histological grade and treatment history. Notably, the lack of molecular and genetic data in most existing studies represents a key limitation in the current literature. Future prospective studies incorporating molecular profiling may improve risk stratification and support more personalized treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".