MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413482847 · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002784

Safety and feasibility trial protocol of metformin in infants after perinatal brain injury

2025· article· en· W4413482847 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea N Endginton, Betsy Pilon, Tamorah Lewis, Martin Offringa, Brian T. Kalish

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Paediatrics Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooThe Scarborough HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminMedicineProtocol (science)Internal medicineAlternative medicinePathologyInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) are at a high risk for neurodevelopmental impairment, and adjunctive treatments to promote brain repair are needed. The antidiabetic drug metformin has recently been recognised as a neurorestorative agent, but, to date, has not been used in infants. Herein, we describe a clinical trial of the safety, feasibility and pharmacokinetics of metformin in infants with HIE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In collaboration with patient and family stakeholders, we designed a pragmatic clinical trial. To determine appropriate dosing of metformin, we performed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling after scaling a published adult PBPK model of metformin to an infant population of full-term newborns to 3-month-olds. Based on this PBPK modelling and target drug exposure, we determined an optimal target dose of 32 mg/kg/day. Trial participants will complete baseline bloodwork and then receive 3 weeks of metformin at 25% of the target dose, followed by 3 weeks of metformin at 50% of the target dose. At a mid-study (6 week) visit, repeat laboratory testing will be done, followed by an additional 6 weeks of metformin at target dosing. The final study visit will include repeat labs following therapy at target dosing. At-home blood glucose monitoring will be used between study visits. Pharmacokinetics of metformin will be evaluated with bloodwork collected at study visits. The incidence of safety events and feasibility measures will be reported using descriptive statistics. Our infant PBPK model will be validated with study samples and the dose for future trials adjusted based on new knowledge about metformin PK in infants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the Boston Children's Hospital Research Ethics Committee will be obtained prior to study initiation. Trial oversight will be under the direction of a Data Safety Monitoring Board. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study has been registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov under NCT06429007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Paediatrics OpenSame topicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsFrench-language works237,207