MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413495371 · doi:10.1038/s41594-025-01652-z

Evolutionary analysis reveals the origin of sodium coupling in glutamate transporters

2025· article· en· W4413495371 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Krishna D. Reddy, Burha Rasool, Farideh Badichi Akher, Nemanja Kutlešić, Swati Pant, Olga Boudker

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Structural & Molecular Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthHoward Hughes Medical InstituteAgouron InstituteWeill Cornell Medical CollegeYork University
KeywordsExcitatory amino-acid transporterTransporterSodium GlutamateGlutamate receptorSodiumCoupling (piping)ChemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryCell biologyBiologyGeneMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secondary active membrane transporters harness the energy of ion gradients to concentrate their substrates. Homologous transporters evolved to couple transport to different ions in response to changing environments and needs. The bases of such diversification and, thus, principles of ion coupling are unexplored. Here, using phylogenetics and ancestral protein reconstruction, we investigated sodium-coupled transport in prokaryotic glutamate transporters, a mechanism ubiquitous across life domains and critical to neurotransmitter recycling in humans by excitatory amino acid transporters from the solute carrier 1 family. By inferring ancestral prokaryotic transporter sequences during a change in the ion-coupling mechanism, we found an evolutionary transition from sodium-dependent to independent substrate binding and transport. Structural and functional experiments on ancestral transporters suggest that the transition involved allosteric mutations, rendering sodium binding dispensable without affecting the ion-binding sites. Allosteric tuning of transporters’ energy landscapes might be a widespread route of their functional diversification. Reddy et al. used ancestral protein reconstruction, cryo-electron microscopy and functional assays to elucidate how a secondary active transporter evolved to harness the energy of sodium gradients to power the concentrative uptake of its substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Structural & Molecular BiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207