Impact of the Intensive Infant and Young Child Feeding Counseling Intervention Program on the Prevention of Wasting and Nutritional Edema in Infants and Children up to 5 Years Old: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Wasting is a key indicator of child survival and well-being. Enhancing practices related to infant and young child feeding (IYCF) is a suggested strategy to mitigate mortality risks and enhance nutritional conditions associated with wasting. Interventions centered on behavioral modifications through IYCF counseling hold promise in increasing the effectiveness of IYCF practices. OBJECTIVE: In this review we sought to study the impact of intensive IYCF counseling interventions for preventing wasting and nutritional edema among infants and children up to 5 years of age. DATA SOURCES: We searched 9 electronic databases for articles published up to July 2021, and conducted an updated search on Ovid MEDLINE and MEDLINE for articles published until April 13, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: Two review authors independently assessed the search results, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. DATA ANALYSIS: Our outcomes included prevalence of wasting and underweight, deterioration to severe wasting, anthropometric outcomes (weight-for-height z-score, weight-for-age z-score) and child morbidity and mortality. We summarized the findings of this review for primary outcomes according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A total of 10 studies from 17 records were found to be eligible for inclusion, and all of these studies were meta-analyzed. Evidence suggests that compared to controls, IYCF counseling is likely to have little to no impact on the prevalence of wasting (relative risk [RR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.04; 10 studies; GRADE: moderate). Intensive IYCF counseling had little to no impact on WHZ, MUAC, or WAZ and had an uncertain impact on the prevalence of diarrhea, fever, cough, and underweight (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; 8 studies; GRADE: very low). CONCLUSION: Nutrition education and counseling showed uncertain GRADE evidence on reducing prevalence of underweight but had no association with wasting. The findings of this review warrant further studies to investigate the impact of IYCF counseling on child morbidity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42021277429.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.021 | 0.033 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".