MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Model Predictive Control Strategy for Single-Phase Four-Cell Flying-Capacitor Totem-Pole PFC Converter with Integrated Power Pulsation Buffer

2025· article· en· W4413514004 on OpenAlexaff
Parth Patel, Ambrish Chandra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlPower (physics)Buffer (optical fiber)Power factorPhase (matter)Control (management)Computer scienceEngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an integrated power pulsation buffering (PPB) technique for a bidirectional single-phase fourcell flying capacitor multilevel (TP-4CFC) totem-pole power factor correction (PFC) converter. By leveraging the inherent energy storage of the flying capacitors, the architecture downsizes the required electrolytic DC-link capacitance and eliminates the need for separate decoupling circuits, enhancing system reliability and power density. A multi-objective model predictive current control (MOMPCC) strategy is employed to simultaneously regulate the grid current and flying capacitor voltages, effectively enabling partial PPB. A bang-bang-type voltage reference scheme based on instantaneous power deviation is used for capacitor voltage regulation. The proposed controller utilizes only lowfrequency inductor current and redundant switching states for PPB operation, simplifying hardware requirements. Simulation results demonstrate a significant reduction in DC-link voltage ripple by 53% and a Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of 2.85% under integrated PPB operation, with a maximum switching frequency limited to 100 kHz. The presented solution is highly suitable for compact and long-lifetime applications such as EV onboard chargers and server power supplies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC Converters→French-language works237,207→