Bibliographic record
Abstract
Security Strategy (EUSS) Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy (Council) GMES becomes Copernicus Program: "Europe's eyes on Earth" Thematic Strategic Paper 2014-2020 (ISP) Joint Communication to the EP & the Council -A Strategic Approach to Resilience in the EU's external action (EC & HR) Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy (Council) The European Green Deal (EC) Concept for an Integrated Approach on Climate Change and Security (EEAS, 2021) Conclusions on Climate and Energy Diplomacy (Council, 2021) EEAS's Climate Change and Defense Roadmap (EP) On strengthening the EU's contribution to rules-based multilateralism (EEAS) Conclusions on EU priorities at the UN (Council) Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace -Programme Statement (EEAS) Thematic Programme on Peace, Stability and Conflict Prevention 2021-2027 (EEAS) Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe, A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy (EEAS) GMES Program -Global Monitoring for Environment and Security Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy -Providing Security in a Changing World (EUSS) Change and International Security (Council & EC) Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy (Council) Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy (Council) A European strategic long-term visions for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy (EC) Highlevel Event: "Climate, Peace and Security: Time for Action" Climate Change and Defense Roadmap (EEAS, 2020) Concept on EU Peace Mediation (EEAS) Conclusions on EU Peace Mediation (Council) The EU's Climate Change and Defense Roadmap (resolution) (EU Parliament, 2022a) A Strategic Compass for Security and Defense (Council, 2022a) Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy (Council, 2022b) Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy (Council) Joint Communication to the EP & the Council -A new outlook on the climate and security nexus (EC & HR) EU, US and NATO communication on climate and security
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".