MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413528876 · doi:10.55248/gengpi.6.0825.2901

Management of the Life cycle of Laboratory Electronic information-GAP Analysis

2025· article· en· W4413528876 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Raghuram, Narayanareddy Papadasu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research Publication and Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic data management in an analytical laboratory extends beyond chromatographic analysis and result issuance.The concept of data integrity, as outlined by the FDA, encompasses data generation, processing, storage, backup, retrieval, and dissemination.The term data integrity refers to the accuracy, consistency and reliability throughout its life cycle.This article primarily delvers into electronic data storage, backup, archiving, retrieval, and restoration, shedding light on common issues and complexities associated with the process.Maintaining data integrity in the pharmaceutical sector is essential for meeting regulatory requirements.Regulatory agencies like US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), European medicines agency (EMA), Health Canada and several regulatory agencies emphasize the importance of data integrity in the field of pharmaceutical and life sciences sector.Regulatory agencies implementing more stringent regulations and guidelines to guarantee that the entire life cycle of pharmaceutical productsranging from research and development to Quality control, Quality assurance, Manufacturing and distribution-is dependable, precise and uniform.Adhering to regulatory standards, including good laboratory practice (GLP), and good manufacturing practices (GMP) is essential for maintaining data integrity and ensuring compliance with regulations during every stage of product development to commercialization.Breaches in data integrity can severely Effects Company"s reputation, stake holder trust, and lead to substantial regulatory consequences, including fines, product ban or legal proceedings.In addition to the above consequences, regulatory agencies may delay or deny the approval of new pharmaceuticals.Based on the above issues , this article primarily delvers into electronic data storage, backup, archiving, retrieval, and restoration, shedding light on common issues and complexities associated with the process.The information provided in this article aids in identifying unauthorized data tampering, deletion, and in enhancing the implementation of data life cycle management to ensure compliance with ALCOA+ principles (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate, Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research Publication and ReviewsSame topicWireless Sensor Networks for Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207