MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413544433 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1530652

Fatigue, interoplastic and nociplastic distress in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, Gulf War Illness, and chronic idiopathic fatigue

2025· article· en· W4413544433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily K. Chen, Tamera Rudder, Charles Nwankwere, James N. Baraniuk

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesCongressional Budget OfficeU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsChronic fatigue syndromeEncephalomyelitisChronic fatigueMedicineDistressPhysical therapyPsychiatryClinical psychologyMultiple sclerosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and Gulf War Illness (GWI) have similar profiles of pain (nociception), visceral interoception, and tenderness (central sensitization) that may be due to dysfunction of midbrain and medulla descending antinociceptive and antiinteroceptive mechanisms. If so, then dolorimetry, a proxy for tenderness, may be correlated with subjective symptoms. The relationship with fatigue was assessed in Chronic Idiopathic Fatigue (CIF). Methods Cohorts of ME/CFS, GWI, and sedentary control subjects completed questionnaires and had dolorimetry. Spearman correlations were calculated between central sensitization (dolorimetry), fatigue (Chalder Fatigue), pain (McGill Pain), interoception (Chronic Multisymptom Inventory), disability (SF36), psychological constructs, and other symptoms. Females were more tender than males and were thus analyzed separately. Results GWI and ME/CFS groups were more tender than controls for females (p < 0.0045) and males (p < 10−6). Receiver operating characteristics area under the curve for female ME/CFS (0.730) and GWI (0.792) and male ME/CFS (0.816) and GWI (0.831) were not optimal for diagnostic purposes. Pain and interoception were highly correlated. Dolorimetry correlated better with pain (Spearman R = −0.574 to −0.629) than interoception (R = −0.417 to −0.545) questionnaires. Dolorimetry correlated weakly with fatigue and disability (|R| < 0.42). CIF was defined by receiver operating characteristics with elevated fatigue, postexertional malaise, and reduced vitality. CIF had intermediate tenderness. Discussion The outcomes generate several hypotheses about ME/CFS and GWI pathophysiology. Disease pathologies may involve injury to midbrain and medulla regulatory pathways causing central sensitization with the loss of descending antiinteroceptive and antinociceptive inhibitory mechanisms and increased perceptions of widespread visceral complaints and pain. The diseases can be re-conceptualized as chronic disabling fatigue with heightened interoceptive and nociceptive symptoms. Variations in antiinteroceptive control may provoke unpredictable shifts in symptom spectrum and severity that contribute to exertional exhaustion and symptom exacerbation. Subjective criteria were found to define CIF prospectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207