MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413558193 · doi:10.2118/225823-ms

Simulating Coupled THM Problem and Wellbore Integrity Analyses with Two-Phase Fluid Flow in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

2025· article· en· W4413558193 on OpenAlexaff
Yarlong Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro Geotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellborePetroleum engineeringFlow (mathematics)GeologyTwo-phase flowPhase (matter)MechanicsFluid dynamicsGeotechnical engineeringChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wellbore integrity is a key concern during injection and production of CH4/H2/CO2. A depleted porous and fractured reservoir with saline is normally selected for these gases storage. Multi-phase fluid flow in naturally fractured reservoirs (NFR) is a complex and important process affecting the injectivity, productivity and fractured skeleton deformation. Either during CH4/H2/CO2 injection/sequestration or extracting the gas process, induced deformation with non-isothermal fluid flow may occur, leading to significant thermal-hydraulic-mechanical (THM) responses of NFR which may generate substantial impact on the safety and efficiency of the project. Numerical methods such as finite element method is commonly applied in simulating THM responses in NFR. The advantage over the finite different method which is popular in reservoirs simulation is that implicit coupled formulation between solid skeleton deformation and fluid flow are much more efficient computationally. Formulation for an implicit pressure and explicit saturation (IMPES+T) finite element approach with an explicit thermal coupling is developed. Different shape functions, i.e. Petrov-Galerkin method, are applied to the saturation, displacement, fluid pressures, and temperature with convective energy transport calculation. In addition, a simplified coupled hydraulic-mechanical (HM) algorithm is proposed for displacement-pressures calculations, which is also coupled to an independently calculated convective-conductive thermal process. The induced effective stresses in vicinity of a wellbore subject to a non-hydrostatic in-situ stresses and non-isothermal condition are highlighted, Dual-porosity model is proposed. Both the hydraulic fracturing risk during injection and wellbore collapse during production are studied. For every 10 °C temperature rise at a wellbore may generate a tangential stress increase of 1 MPa which is equivalent to a formation strength reduction of the same magnitude. Similarly a tangential stress reduction of 1 MPa at a wellbore may delay a hydraulic fracturing due to such a temperature change. Accurate calculations of the THM induced effective stresses and temperature perturbations at a wellbore and inside the NFR are the focus in this paper. The model proposed and investigation in this study may be applied for CH4/H2/CO2 injection or sequestration design in NFR so that safe range of permissible surface pressure and temperature can be maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→