The Importance of Recognition and Management of Oral Lichen Planus: Navigating Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Cancer Risk, and Advances in Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder classified as an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) due to its association with an increased prevalence and a risk of progressing to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of up to 5%. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review to update the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of OLP using PubMed and Web of Science databases up to April 2025. RESULTS: OLP is a T-cell-mediated disorder, with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells playing a key role in its pathogenesis. Its multifactorial nature involves genetics, infections, immune dysregulation, allergens, stress, autoimmune diseases, and medications. Treatment options include topical corticosteroids as the first-line therapy, along with systemic medications and emerging therapies that show promise in management. CONCLUSIONS: Regular monitoring and early intervention are crucial due to OLP's malignant potential. Further research is needed to refine treatments and assess long-term efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".