MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413612164 · doi:10.70157/e.v9i1.2717

Peran Keputusan Berkunjung Dalam Meningkatkan Pengaruh Pemasaran Media Sosial Dan Citra Destinasi Terhadap Kepuasan Wisatawan Di Taman Wisata Alam (TWA) Angke Kapuk

2024· article· en· W4413612164 on OpenAlexaff
Natalia Dea Kurniawati, Nova Eviana

Bibliographic record

VenueEduturisma. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourist satisfaction has been extensively discussed in various academic studies owing to its potential to yield managerial benefits while simultaneously upholding the sustainability of tourist destinations. Prior research has yielded varied findings concerning the impact of social media marketing and destination image on tourist satisfaction. Discrepancies in these findings have prompted inquiries into potential mediating variables. This study aims to investigate the direct influence of social media marketing and destination image on tourist satisfaction, as well as the potential mediation by visiting decisions. Data was collected via questionnaires administered to 154 tourists at TWA Angke Kapuk and analyzed using path analysis techniques. The findings revealed that both social media marketing and destination image significantly and positively influenced visiting decisions and tourist satisfaction. Moreover, the impact of social media marketing and destination image on tourist satisfaction was found to be greater when mediated by visiting decisions. Consequently, managers at TWA Angke Kapuk must enhance the utilization of various social media platforms and enrich content to bolster the positive perception of the destination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEduturisma.Same topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207