MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413640741 · doi:10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101946

Atorvastatin and left atrial function during anthracycline-based chemotherapy

2025· article· en· W4413640741 on OpenAlexaff
Vencel Juhász, Zsófia D. Drobni, Thiago Quinaglia, Hannah Gilman, Giselle Alexandra Suero‐Abreu, Azin Ghamari, Julius C. Heemelaar, Donna Neuberg, Yuchi Han, Bonnie Ky, Raymond Y. Kwong, James L. Januzzi, Aarti Asnani, Negareh Mousavi, Robert Redd, Michael Jerosch‐Herold, Marielle Scherrer‐Crosbie, Tomas G. Neilan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaAmerican Society of Echocardiography
KeywordsMedicineAtorvastatinAngiologyAnthracyclineInternal medicineCardiologyChemotherapyCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Structural and functional abnormalities of the left atrium (LA) predict adverse outcomes such as heart failure and mortality in many patients with heart disease. However, the effect of anthracyclines on LA structural and functional abnormalities remains incompletely characterized. Further, atorvastatin prevented the anthracycline-associated decline in the left ventricular ejection fraction; however, whether atorvastatin protects against anthracycline-associated impairment of LA structure and function is currently unknown. METHODS: In the STOP-CA randomized clinical trial, participants with lymphoma treated with anthracyclines were randomized to placebo (n=150) or atorvastatin (n=150) for 12 months. In post hoc analyses, CMR-derived LA volumetric and functional measurements (reservoir [GLS], conduit, and booster strain) were measured at baseline and 12 months using feature tracking (FT). The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion of participants with a ≥1 SD decrease in LA GLS between the atorvastatin and placebo groups. The secondary endpoint was a ≥20% relative decrease in LA GLS. Other exploratory endpoints included volume indices and emptying fractions. RESULTS: Of 300 participants, 158 (mean age 51±16years, 48% female, 83 with atorvastatin) had paired CMR-derived LA strain and volumetric data at baseline and follow-up. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics and cancer treatment. All LA strain and volumetric measures were similar between the two groups at baseline. Among the placebo group, LA GLS decreased from baseline to follow-up (35.5±8.8 vs 32.4±8.2%, p=0.007). A ≥1 SD absolute decrease in LA GLS (8.8% units) was observed among 24% with atorvastatin and 28% with placebo (p=0.59). Similarly, a ≥20% relative decrease in GLS was observed in 25% vs 31% (p=0.48). Participants over 50 had an almost 10% (9.9%, 95% confidence interval: -18.75, -1.12) greater relative decrease in LA GLS with anthracyclines. There were no differences between cardiac hospitalization rates with a ≥1 SD absolute decrease (5% vs 8%, p=0.72) in LA GLS at 24 months. Among other indices of LA structure and function, the LA total emptying fraction also decreased from baseline to follow-up, with no differences between groups at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin did not attenuate the decline in CMR-derived LA GLS among lymphoma patients undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02943590; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02943590.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceSame topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationFrench-language works237,207