Retrograde transvenous coil embolization in spinal epidural arteriovenous fistula with radiculo–perimedullary reflux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEAVFs) with intradural reflux are rare but important vascular lesions that may cause progressive myelopathy due to spinal cord venous hypertension. Although traditionally managed by means of arterial embolization or surgical disconnection, these approaches can pose risks, particularly when critical vascular structures, such as the artery of Adamkiewicz, originate in close proximity to the fistulous site. We report the case of a patient in their 60s who presented with progressive paraparesis over approximately 1 year, ultimately attributed to an SEAVF located adjacent to the right L1-L2 neural foramen, with radiculo-perimedullary reflux. The artery of Adamkiewicz was visualized with its origin near the shunt site, rendering arterial embolization unsafe and prompting selection of a purely transvenous endovascular approach. Venous access was obtained via the azygos system, and a microcatheter was navigated through the epidural venous pouch to reach a cranially directed draining vein extending toward the perimedullary venous system, which was then embolized using detachable platinum coils. The procedure achieved complete occlusion of the targeted vein, with early neurological improvement and significant reduction in spinal cord edema on follow-up imaging. This case supports the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transvenous embolization for SEAVFs and underscores its expanding role in the treatment of complex spinal vascular lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".