PPBR: Privacy-Preserving and Byzantine-Robust Edge-Assisted Hierarchical Federated Learning in Mobile Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edge-assisted Hierarchical Federated Learning (EHFL) accelerates global model training across mobile devices by hierarchically aggregating models. However, EHFL encounters critical challenges such as privacy risks for local and edge-level models, vulnerability to collusive Byzantine attacks, and issues with model diversity and heterogeneity due to Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) data. In this paper, we propose PPBR, a novel hybrid scheme that subtly integrates Condensed Local Differential Privacy (CLDP) and Packed Linearly Homomorphic Encryption (PLHE) to achieve strong privacy protection and resilience against various Byzantine attacks in Non-IID data scenarios. Specifically, PPBR clusters the sign statistics of local models and clips the norms of edge-level momenta to filter anomalous models and mitigate Byzantine faults while retaining diverse models coming from Non-IID data. To enhance privacy protection with acceptable accuracy loss, the sign tuples of local models are perturbed with CLDP guarantees, and the momenta of edge-level models are encrypted under PLHE. Meanwhile, PPBR enhances privacy in single-edge-server and single-cloud-server aggregations by using random perturbations, secret sharing, and PLHE. In addition to safeguarding privacy with accommodating abrupt dropouts of mobile devices and edge servers, the aggregations effectively mitigate the adverse effects of Non-IID data under advanced Byzantine attacks. Theoretical analysis and comprehensive experiments validate PPBR's strong privacy guarantees and resilience to various Byzantine attacks under Non-IID data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".