MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413677374 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3602911

PPBR: Privacy-Preserving and Byzantine-Robust Edge-Assisted Hierarchical Federated Learning in Mobile Networks

2025· article· en· W4413677374 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanyuan He, Peng Yang, Zhe Sun, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInformation privacyMobile computingDistributed computingComputer securityArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edge-assisted Hierarchical Federated Learning (EHFL) accelerates global model training across mobile devices by hierarchically aggregating models. However, EHFL encounters critical challenges such as privacy risks for local and edge-level models, vulnerability to collusive Byzantine attacks, and issues with model diversity and heterogeneity due to Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) data. In this paper, we propose PPBR, a novel hybrid scheme that subtly integrates Condensed Local Differential Privacy (CLDP) and Packed Linearly Homomorphic Encryption (PLHE) to achieve strong privacy protection and resilience against various Byzantine attacks in Non-IID data scenarios. Specifically, PPBR clusters the sign statistics of local models and clips the norms of edge-level momenta to filter anomalous models and mitigate Byzantine faults while retaining diverse models coming from Non-IID data. To enhance privacy protection with acceptable accuracy loss, the sign tuples of local models are perturbed with CLDP guarantees, and the momenta of edge-level models are encrypted under PLHE. Meanwhile, PPBR enhances privacy in single-edge-server and single-cloud-server aggregations by using random perturbations, secret sharing, and PLHE. In addition to safeguarding privacy with accommodating abrupt dropouts of mobile devices and edge servers, the aggregations effectively mitigate the adverse effects of Non-IID data under advanced Byzantine attacks. Theoretical analysis and comprehensive experiments validate PPBR's strong privacy guarantees and resilience to various Byzantine attacks under Non-IID data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207