Mapping cerebral blood flow in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and orthostatic intolerance: insights from a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex and debilitating condition with a large proportion of patients that experience orthostatic intolerance (OI). This systematic review aimed to assess whether cerebral blood flow (CBF) is reduced in ME/CFS and OI, and whether the presence of both conditions leads to an additional decline in CBF. METHODS: PubMed (from 1943), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1947) and Cochrane were searched from inception to February 14th, 2025, using terms including "chronic fatigue syndrome", "myalgic encephalomyelitis", "orthostatic intolerance" and "cerebral blood flow". Article selection required the following criteria: published in English; CBF measured in participants with either ME/CFS or OI, or both ME/CFS and OI combined. Quality assessment and risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. RESULTS: Of 14,928 articles, 118 were included, 26 (22.1%) of which studied CBF in ME/CFS alone, 81 (68.6%) in OI alone and 11 (9.3%) in both ME/CFS and OI. Overall, the articles included 9185 participants, with a mean age of 39.1 years (SD = 8.8), and 73.8% of participants were female. Studies found CBF was significantly reduced in 12 of the articles focused on ME/CFS and in 56 of those focused on OI; compared to controls. Additionally, in 4 out of 11 studies that examined both conditions, CBF was further reduced in participants suffering from both conditions compared to those with ME/CFS alone. CONCLUSIONS: CBF is reduced in ME/CFS and OI alone and having both conditions comorbidly amplifies CBF reductions. Therefore, observing CBF changes in ME/CFS with and without OI may be important in monitoring disease severity. Despite this, few studies focus on the combination of ME/CFS and OI, and OI may be a confounding factor in CBF in a large portion of ME/CFS studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".