MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413702221 · doi:10.1111/sms.70127

Investigating the Modulation of Corticomotor and Neuromuscular Function by Contralateral and Ipsilateral Experimental Pain Applied During Cycling

2025· article· en· W4413702221 on OpenAlexafffund
Jenny Zhang, Arezou Habibirad, Kirsty Bannister, Martin J. MacInnis, Saied Jalal Aboodarda

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationIsometric exerciseSilent periodPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiorespiratory fitnessMedicinePsychologyPhysical therapyNeuroscienceStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Pain can impair exercise performance, but its influence on motor control, in particular the effect of robust experimental pain on the timecourse of corticomotor responses throughout prolonged, exhaustive cycling, remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that an augmented experimental pain intervention applied to exercising and non‐exercising limbs would modulate neuromuscular function, corticospinal excitability and inhibition, and exacerbate perceptual and cardiorespiratory responses to exercise. Ten healthy adults (two females) completed three single‐leg cycling sessions at 60% peak power output to failure: without experimental pain (CTRL), with intermittent occlusions applied to the resting leg (CONTRA), and with occlusions upon the exercising leg (IPSI). Every 5 min, single‐ and paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulations were applied during cycling to assess corticospinal excitability () and short‐ and long‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI). Participants also performed 5‐s isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) coupled with superimposed and resting femoral stimulations. Perceptual responses and cardiorespiratory variables were recorded throughout exercise. Time to failure was blunted in CONTRA (37.2 ± 13.1 min, p = 0.015) and IPSI (27.1 ± 11.4 min, p = 0.003) compared to CTRL (61.1 ± 21.5 min). Though they declined across time, MVC force, voluntary activation, and resting twitch force did not differ across conditions. While was similar, SICI was higher in CONTRA (p < 0.001) and LICI was higher in CONTRA but lower in IPSI (p = 0.02) than CTRL. Both conditions upregulated pain in the affected leg and exacerbated ratings of fatigue and effort (p < 0.001), while IPSI increased ventilation. Experimental pain augmented perceptual responses without impairing neuromuscular function, but the site of application can oppositely modulate cortical inhibition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in SportsSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207