MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413741038 · doi:10.17975/sfj-2025-012

Where is the plaque?

2025· article· en· W4413741038 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Tao Xu, Aaron Fenster

Bibliographic record

VenueSTEM Fellowship Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Thrombus and Embolism
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carotid artery atherosclerosis—an asymptomatic yet principal driver of stroke and other cardiovascular events—is routinely monitored with B-mode ultrasound, where the total plaque area (TPA) offers a sensitive, non-invasive marker of risk progression. Precise TPA measurement, however, still depends on labor-intensive manual tracing that suffers from significant inter- and intra-observer variability, limiting throughput in both clinical practice and large-scale epidemiological studies. Over the past decade, researchers have sought to streamline this task: early semi-automated pipelines based on fuzzy region growing, optical-flow tracking, or active-contour “snake” models reduced – but did not eliminate – human input, while first-generation fully automated systems adopted U-Net architectures yet were typically trained on a few hundred images and leveraged ensembles or model stacking to reach competitive accuracy. Building on this foundation, we present a systematic comparison of four U-Net variants that pair a standard decoder with encoder backbones of increasing representational power—VGG19, MobileNet-v2, Inception-ResNet-v2, and Xception—trained and validated on 851 images drawn from 214 patients. All models were optimized end-to-end using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) loss, and their generalisation was assessed on an unseen 10% test split. The Xception-U-Net achieved the best performance, reaching a DSC of 0.86 without any ensemble boosting, and outperformed a comparably sized Inception-ResNet-v2 model, despite having ~40% fewer parameters. Transfer learning from ImageNet conferred only marginal gains (< 0.02 DSC), highlighting the limited relevance of natural-image features for the speckled and low-contrast visual patterns characteristic of ultrasound imaging. Although overall accuracy is bounded by annotation variability and the modest cohort size, our results demonstrate that a single, computationally efficient model trained on a medium-scale, domain-specific dataset can match or exceed stacked architectures that rely on smaller corpora. By delivering expert-level segmentation in a fraction of a second, the proposed framework enables automated, point-of-care plaque quantification, supports standardised multi-site trials, and contributes to more equitable cardiovascular risk stratification in resource-constrained settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTEM Fellowship JournalSame topicAortic Thrombus and EmbolismFrench-language works237,207