Rotational Stability and Subjective Results of Tecnis Eyhance Toric II Intraocular Lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate rotational stability and patient-reported outcomes associated with Tecnis Eyhance toric II "monofocal plus" intraocular lens (IOL), particularly in light of a modified haptic design. Methods: A prospective, interventional study was conducted with patients undergoing routine cataract surgery and Tecnis Eyhance toric II IOL implantation. The inclusion criteria were topographic corneal astigmatism of 0.5-4.0D. Exclusion criteria included previous corneal or ocular surgeries, mesopic pupils >5.5mm, wear of rigid gas-permeable contact lenses, and ophthalmic pathologies that might limit vision outcomes. Toric stability was assessed on day 1, week 1, and month 3 using slit-lamp exams and toriCAM app. Quality of Vision (QoV) and Near Activity Visual Questionnaires (NAVQ) before the surgery and 3 months post-operatively. Results: The study analyzed 98 eyes from 65 patients. Mean absolute IOL rotation was 1.73±1.64° (range: 0-7°) from day 1 to week 1, with 95% rotating ≤5°. From week 1 to month 3, mean rotation was 1.13±1.53° (range: 0-8°), with 98% rotating ≤5°. Conclusion: The data from this study suggest that the Tecnis Eyhance toric II IOL exhibits good postoperative rotational stability and positive patient-reported visual outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".