MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413752794 · doi:10.26443/seismica.v2i4.1599

Tectonic tremor: The chatter of mafic underplating

2025· article· en· W4413752794 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Geena Littel, M. G. Bostock, C. G. Sammis, Simon M. Peacock, Andrew J. Calvert

Bibliographic record

VenueSeismica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaficUnderplatingTectonicsGeologyGeochemistrySeismologySubduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tremor is a weak seismic signal accompanying slow fault slip at plate boundaries. The relationship between tremor and slow slip and the tremor source mechanism have been widely debated, owing largely to the challenge of accurately locating tremor in depth. We assemble a tremor hypocenter catalog of 4,851 events in a 10 x 20 km2 area beneath Vancouver Island during three slow slip episodes between 2003 and 2005 using a cross-station detection method adapted from previous studies to recover accurate depths. Improved tremor locations provide key constraints on i) thickness of the tremorgenic zone, ii) the relative location of tremor to key structural features in the subduction complex, and iii) the geologic context and mechanism of tremor. Tremor occurs in quasi-planar clusters < 500 m thick at a depth near 39 km, beneath a high reflectivity layer and within a zone of elevated Poisson's ratio with P-wave velocities of ~7 km/s. We interpret tremor as originating in the fragmentation of the upper few hundred meters of basaltic oceanic crust. Comminuted and overpressured basalt with increasingly anisotropic fabric is underplated onto overriding lithosphere to generate high reflectivity. Tremor thus manifests areas of material transfer across the plate boundary during slow slip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeismicaSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207