MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413754532 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.22.671748

Phytoremediation of 25+ Years Weathered Petroleum Contamination with Symbiotic Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> ATCC 21332

2025· preprint· en· W4413754532 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Prama Roy

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's University
KeywordsPhytoremediationBacillus subtilisArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiContaminationArbuscular mycorrhizalBiologyEnvironmental scienceMycorrhizal fungiBotanyAgronomySymbiosisHorticultureBacteriaEcologyInoculation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) contamination affects approximately 60% of Canadian contaminated sites, with the boreal ecozone facing acute exposure from industrial activities. This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of plant-microbe enhanced phytoremediation of 25+ years weathered PHC-contaminated field soil over a 24-month period. Five native or naturalized plant species (three tufted grasses, a forb, and a tree) were tested across two contaminated soils and a control to compare remediation efficacy and plant health: 25,700 mg/kg total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and a 1:1 contaminated and background site soil mixture (12,600 mg/kg TPH). Soil treatments included a Plants-Only Control, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), plant-growth-promoting-rhizobacterium - Bacillus subtilis , and AMF+ B. subtilis . Plant inoculation significantly improved remediation compared to natural attenuation (No Plants Control) in both PHC-contaminated soils. AMF-based treatments significantly remediated both soils: AMF in the 25,700 mg/kg TPH soil (74% mean TPH remediation) and AMF+ B. subtilis in the 12,600 mg/kg TPH soil (96% remediation). In the 12,600 mg/kg TPH soil, all treatments successfully reduced PHC levels to below federal and provincial thresholds (≥95% removal) within 17 months. Picea mariana (black spruce) and Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem) above- and below-ground biomasses were not significantly impaired by the 25,700 and 12,600 mg/kg TPH soils, indicating their suitability for site remediation. B. subtilis significantly improved above-ground biomass and plant height and is therefore recommended for co-inoculation with AMF. These findings demonstrate that AMF-enhanced phytoremediation represents a highly effective, sustainable approach for long-term PHC remediation in Canadian boreal ecosystems, offering significant advantages over natural attenuation processes alone. Highlights AMF-based treatments achieved highest PHC removal in 25+ year weathered boreal soils Prairie grasses remediated 12,600 mg/kg TPH soil by >95% in AMF+ B. subtilis treatment Enhanced Picea mariana (black spruce) biomass and moisture in 25,700 mg/kg TPH soil Bacillus subtilis significantly enhanced plant above-ground biomass and height AMF helped maximize PHC remediation, while B. subtilis promoted plant growth

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→