Aperiodic and Periodic EEG Component Lifespan Trajectories: Monotonic Decrease versus Growth-then-Decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1.1 Abstract Unraveling the lifespan trajectories of human brain development is critical for understanding brain health and disease. Recent research demonstrates that electroencephalography signals are composed of periodic and aperiodic components reflecting distinct physiological substrates. This dissociation raises the possibility that they follow different developmental tendencies. Here, we delineate the lifespan trajectories of aperiodic and periodic neural oscillations using a large international cohort (N=1,563, ages 5–95, resting state, eyes closed). We reveal two fundamental developmental patterns: a Monotonic decrease in aperiodic activity and a Growth-and-Decline pattern for periodic activity. Both components have inflections around age 20 and transition to a stable senescent phase around age 40. Spatially, anterior regions mainly exhibit aperiodic activity, while periodic activity concentrate on posterior regions and these patterns remain stable throughout life. Crucially, multimodal analysis shows these trajectories map onto distinct biological substrates. The periodic component’s Growth and Decline trajectory aligns with GABAergic function and myelination. In contrast, the monotonically decreasing trajectory of aperiodic activity mirrors fundamental biomarkers of biological aging, such as DNA methylation and telomere length. Transforming age to a logarithmic scale simplifies these nonlinear trajectories into a linear decreasing and a piecewise concave linear model for aperiodic and periodic components. This form provides a robust and parsimonious framework for quantifying maturation and identifying neurological deviations. Highlights We delineate distinct lifespan trajectories of aperiodic and periodic neural activity in a large-scale international cohort (N=1,563, ages 5–95). Aperiodic activity undergoes a Monotonic Decrease with age. In contrast, periodic activity follows a Growth-then-Decline trajectory, peaking in early adulthood. Both trajectories feature a critical transition around age 20 and stabilize into a protracted senescent phase from approximately 40 onward. These neural trajectories map onto distinct biological substrates: periodic activity tracks integrative functions (myelination, GABAergic, and aperiodic decline mirrors fundamental aging processes (DNA methylation). A stable pattern observed throughout the lifespan is the spatial segregation of neural activity, where aperiodic signals are dominant in anterior regions and periodic signals are concentrated in posterior ones. Logarithmically transforming age linearized the developmental trajectories, yielding a monotonic decline for the aperiodic component and a concave piecewise for the periodic one. This process establishes robust linear norms for the personalized assessment of brain dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".