MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413757834 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17445-9

Heterogeneous dual-decoder network for road extraction in remote sensing images

2025· article· en· W4413757834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shenming Qu, Xiangnan Zhang, Yanhong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceExtraction (chemistry)Dual (grammatical number)Artificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate road extraction from remote sensing images is crucial for autonomous driving, urban planning, and route planning. However, existing methods struggle to address the challenges of scale variation, occlusion, and blurred boundaries. To tackle these challenges, this paper proposes a heterogeneous dual-decoder network (HDDNet), which aims to simultaneously solve the multiple problems in remote sensing road extraction by designing two decoders with complementary functions. Specifically, the main decoder incorporates the Dynamic Snake Grouping Dilation (DSGD) module, which combines road morphological features with a grouped multi-scale receptive field to enhance the capture of narrow and multi-scale road features. The auxiliary decoder integrates the Multi-directional Connectivity and Boundary Enhancement (MCBE) module, which jointly optimizes road connectivity and boundary refinement by leveraging directional consistency between the road body and edges. Finally, the Dual Attention Feature Fusion (DAFF) module is introduced to interactively learn and fuse the output features of the main decoder and the auxiliary decoder in both spatial and channel dimensions, which improves the accuracy and robustness of feature representations. We conducted systematic experiments on three representative public datasets: DeepGlobe, Ottawa, and CHN6-CUG. The results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms current mainstream approaches in the road extraction task, achieving Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of 71.36%, 91.85%, and 67.27%, respectively, which strongly validates the performance and robustness of HDDNet across diverse road scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207