MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413758115 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.22.671863

The C-terminal ZZ domain of the Drosophila ORB2 RNA-binding protein is required for spermatid individualization

2025· preprint· en· W4413758115 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy C.H. Low, Brook L. Falk, Julie A. Brill, Howard D. Lipshitz

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicVector-Borne Animal Diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)SpermatidDrosophila (subgenus)Cell biologyDomain (mathematical analysis)RNA-binding proteinDrosophila melanogasterRNAGeneticsBiologyComputational biologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsGeneMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ORB2 is the Drosophila ortholog of the human CPEB2-4 family of RNA-binding proteins, which include a conserved C-terminal Zinc-binding (‘ZZ’) domain. We have recently shown that this domain interacts with several translation co-repressors in the early embryo, and that deletion of this domain from the endogenous orb2 gene results in derepression of its target mRNAs (LOW et al . 2025). Here we assess the effect of deletion of the ZZ domain on spermatogenesis. We find that ORB2ΔZZ protein is no longer localized to the distal tip of spermatids; that in orb2 ΔZZ testes, additional proteins known to play a role in spermatid individualization – ORB, IMP, SOTI – are mislocalized; that the SOTI-dependent Cleaved Caspase 3 gradient no longer forms; that individualization complexes are defective; and that orb2 ΔZZ flies are sterile and lack mature sperm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicVector-Borne Animal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207