Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our built environment is constantly in transition. Due to changes in conditions or demands bridges, barrages and locks can become redundant. So happened in Zoutkamp, a former fishermen's village laying just behind the seawall of the Lauwerszee, the Netherlands. On May 23, 1969, the sea was enclosed and it has been called Lauwersmeer ever since. Although the Hunsingolock and the Reitdieplock lost their main function, they remain important relics within the community. To adapt to the effects of climate change both locks undergo profound transformations for a resilient future. The Reitdieplock of 1877 functions as the main entrance of the village facilitating daily traffic, logistics as well as recreational bicycle routes and trails. Therefore the lock needed to be adjusted with a 4 meter wide new bridge parallel to the existing bridge. The design of the pedestrian bridge originates from careful handling with the monumental lock, the intended recreational use and experience of the place. A new layer is added to the existing, in line with historical development of the lock. Constraints of the existing historic structure had some challenges in relation to the preservation of the monument, structural design, integration of the openable deck part and minimal deviations within the construction. The process with the local community, the national preservation department and the contractor show the zero tolerance in design, construction and installing of the bridge on site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.699 | 0.362 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".