MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413769589 · doi:10.1002/hsr2.70677

The Silent Burden: Understanding Alexithymia and Its Correlation With University Student Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a Cross‐Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4413769589 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asma Darvishi, Nikoo Almani, Fatemeh Zarimeidani, Rahem Rahmati, Hadi Raeisi Shahraki

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Science Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShahrekord University of Medical SciencesShahrekord University
KeywordsAlexithymiaAnxietyPsychologyCross-sectional studyDepression (economics)CorrelationClinical psychologyStress (linguistics)PsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background and Aims In a time of increasing mental health difficulties among college students globally, where 20%–45% experience disorders annually, mood disorders emerge as a prevalent concern. These disorders mainly impact individuals aged 18 to 30 and significantly affect academic performance and long‐term well‐being. This study aimed to assess the psychological well‐being of university students, focusing on alexithymia, depression, anxiety, stress, and their complex relationships. Methods Using a multi‐stage sampling approach, the study was conducted in 2019 with 260 undergraduate students at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) questionnaire measured depression, anxiety, and stress, while the Toronto Alexithymia Scale‐20 (TAS‐20) assessed alexithymia. The data were analyzed using SPSS v.23.0. Results The participants had a mean age of 20.7 ± 3.2 years, were mostly female (75.7%), single (90.7%), and of Fars ethnicity (66.1%). The majority lived in dormitories (70.3%). Alexithymia was present in 30.8% of the population, with males scoring higher than females ( p = 0.04). Also, students aged 18–19 had lower depression ( p = 0.04) and anxiety ( p = 0.04) scores. We found significant positive correlations between alexithymia and stress, depression, and anxiety ( p < 0.001). Moreover, a strong positive correlation was observed between depression and both anxiety ( p < 0.001) and stress ( p < 0.001). Additionally, anxiety demonstrated a notable correlation with stress ( p < 0.001), underscoring the intricate interplay among these psychological factors. Conclusion Identifying alexithymia in medical settings is essential, as it can affect patient–provider communication and care. Students with alexithymic traits may benefit from interventions targeting both alexithymia and co‐occurring mental disorders like depression and anxiety. Future research should focus on developing tailored treatments and early screening to improve emotional regulation and mental health outcomes, particularly in high‐stress academic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Science ReportsSame topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207